
If you were absent today and were unable to sign up for a presentation slot, you will be presenting on Monday 12/9. However, you will be able to sign up for a specific number in the order if you are present on Wednesday 12/4.

If you were absent today and were unable to sign up for a presentation slot, you will be presenting on Monday 12/9. However, you will be able to sign up for a specific number in the order if you are present on Wednesday 12/4.
More detailed directions here: Descriptive Outlining Instructions (from Kim Liao)
For this Peer Review Day, you and your group will be making “descriptive outlines” or “reverse outlines” of each other’s papers. It’s called “reverse outlining” because instead of outlining a paper before you write it, you are outlining a paper that already exists. It’s “descriptive outlining” because in addition to outlining the content of the paper, you also describe the rhetorical purpose of each paragraph.
Choose whose paper you will outline first. For EACH paragraph, the other group members should collaboratively discuss two things/answer two questions:
The writer should write down what the group members decide for each one, even if the writer disagrees with their answers. The writer will then have a reverse outline of how their paper comes across to readers.
AFTER that, if you still have time, you can discuss other aspects of the paper as a group.
Partial Draft Due: 11/25 (Monday by 8:00am)
Full First Draft Due: 11/27 (Wednesday by 8:00am)
Final Draft Due: 12/4 (Wednesday by midnight)
For a word doc version of this rubric, please click here: Final Paper Rubric
For this assignment, you will compose a 6-10 page paper in which you synthesize research on the topic of your choosing to answer (or begin to answer) your inquiry question(s).
In your essay, you should:
There are many ways to outline a paper. Some are formal and highly structured, and some are very loose, and most are inbetween! An outline can be mostly or entirely textual, or it can include visual elements. An outline can be a graphic organizer for essay writing that you find online and fill in.
I realized that you might have never written an outline before, or not really know what to do for this assignment, so I’ve compiled some examples for you. These are only SOME of the ways you can outline.
I will just be grading your outline on completion (did you do it), timeliness (did you turn it in on time), and detail (did you actually put time and effort into this based on your research so far), not on any specific form or formatting.
An outline might not make sense to someone else who is reading it, because it’s notes the writer is leaving their future selves to help with the drafting process. As long as it makes sense to you, that’s what matters.
Okay, these are some of mine from my sophomore year of college.
Outline 1: Witchcraft Outline
I like this one because of the color-coding. I wrote the main ideas/section headers in black, all of the things I wanted to talk about in that section in blue, and the names of the authors I wanted to cite in red. I also wrote out my thesis in full at the top to always remind me of what I was trying to argue. It helped keep me focused.
Outline 2: Amanda Palmer Project Outline
In this one, I didn’t use color coding, just loose nests of bullets and main ideas. However, you can tell when I copy/pasted a quote from a source, because the font and coloring is different. I did this to remind myself of what quotes/examples I wanted to use as evidence in each section.
These are from a colleague of mine, also from her early years of college. Notice that she uses a much more formalized structure of headings and subheadings (numbers, capital letters, roman numerals, lowercase letters, etc.) than I do. In one case, she wrote her entire introduction as part of the outline.
This person uses the standard structure of a scientific paper (Intro/Methods/Results/Discussion) but then added sublevels of bullets to her outline based on her specific topic. (This was for an advanced research course where psychology majors had to design and conduct their own studies.)
Once she had her outline, she wrote her paragraphs in the same document underneath each subheading. By the end, she had almost an entire paper and just had to paste the paragraphs into another document and add transitions/formatting.
Same outline with paragraphs: Copy of Outline
Today (11/18) we will be working on the “Scripted Interview,” one of the 8 assignments the English department requires from all 101 students. If you are unable to finish this during class, please complete it for homework (Due Monday 11/25 by 8:00am).
Total: 12 points
For people who conducted their own interviews: Don’t rewrite your actual interviews with the people, but ask new questions in this assignment and imagine what your interviewee might have said based on their responses to your real questions.
To complete this assignment, you must think seriously and carefully about each author’s point of view (based on what they wrote/said in your source) in order to imagine (as accurately as possible) what they would think/say about your questions.
It also might help to consider, if you were actually interviewing those two people, what would be interesting to hear both of them talk about?
Format the interview like a script. For example:
Scripted Interview Formatting Example
Olivia: What is the most important thing you have learned in college so far, and why?
Student 1: I learned that I have to be really careful about planning my time, because it’s easy to get behind, and if you’re behind, you don’t have time to do a very good job on your assignments or think about them a lot. So you learn less, even if the material is easy.
Olivia: I agree, that’s super important!
Proposals Due: Monday October 21st (via email or handed in during class)
Often, both academics and writers outside of the university do not just write an essay and submit it. Journalists pitch article ideas to their editors, and others might need to propose a topic before getting approval to write it.
For example (and this is 100% true), I recently applied to be part of a collection of essays about the TV show Riverdale, but I didn’t need to write my entire essay first. I sent them a proposal describing what I intended to write about, and only if I was accepted (I wasn’t) would I need to write the entire essay.
Meeting the Above Requirements: 8 points, distributed as noted in the guidelines
Turning the Proposal In On Time: 2 points
Total: 10 points
An inquiry question is something you genuinely do not know the answer to but would like to find out. It must be complex enough to require research and careful thought. Generally, you should avoid questions with simple yes/no answers. “How…?” “Why…?” and “In what ways…?” questions are typically better.
You’re allowed to have a hypothesis about the answer to your inquiry questions, but you should also be open to being wrong.
As you develop your questions, think carefully about scope. If your question is too big/broad, it will be impossible to answer it between now and the end of the semester, and impossible to describe your research in only 6-8 pages. (Some inquiry questions are so big that they require years of research and entire books or series of books can be written about them!). If your question is too small/specific, you will have trouble finding enough to write about. What seems feasible for you to:
An example of a too-big question: Last year, I had my students write a more substantial rhetorical analysis essay than I’m having you do for your “analysis of an ad” projects. One student’s inquiry question was essentially, “What’s up with Trump’s rhetoric?” That’s WAY too big of a topic for one essay! Trump says more things all the time! I encouraged him to just pick one speech or one set of tweets.
These are up for discussion/negotiation/revision. Please either leave a comment with your questions/suggestions or remember them to bring up in class.
For a .docx version of these guidelines, click here: Final Research Paper Assignment Overview
For the last half of the semester, we will be writing toward our final research papers. The final research paper is worth 20% of your total grade in the course, and the process assignments leading up to the final paper are worth another 20%.
Choose any topic you wish to research that relates to one of the chapter themes in Weapons of Math Destruction (algorithmic modeling, college admissions and rankings, online advertising, criminal justice, job applicant systems, scheduling workers’ shifts, credit scores, the insurance industry, Facebook and politics). This is a broad range of topics! I’m open to you taking this project in a variety of directions.
Remember: Choose something you find interesting enough to hold your attention for the next several weeks. This is a long project process, and it will be very hard if you’re bored by your own topic.
Write an argumentative research paper (perhaps 6-10 pages) that answers an inquiry question you have about one of the topics above. You should include some discussion of the use of algorithms/Big Data in relation to your topic, but that does not need to be the main focus.
October 21 (Monday): Proposals Due
October 28-30 (1 week): Learning Research Skills and Computer Lab Time for Research
November 18 (Monday): Annotated Bibliography Due
November 18 (Monday): In-Class Process Assignment—Imaginary Interview
November 20 (Wednesday): Outline Due
November 25 (Monday): Partial Draft Due, first day of Peer Review
November 27 (Wednesday): Full First Draft Due, second day of Peer Review
December 4 (Wednesday): Final Draft Due
December 9-11 (1 week): Presenting our projects to each other
December 16 (Monday): Portfolios Due, All Revisions of Previous Assignments Due